Chapter 6Word classes
The parts of speech of Sakhalin Ainu and the criteria that distinguish them.
Sakhalin Ainu has two large open classes, nouns and verbs, and a set of closed classes: postpositions, demonstratives and other adnominals, numerals, adverbs, conjunctive particles, sentence-final and discourse particles, and interjections. There is no separate class of adjectives: property concepts are intransitive verbs (§6.4). The first systematic classification along these lines is Chiri (1942), whose Sakhalin-centred grammar distinguishes predicators (his 用詞, covering both action and property words, and split by a single morphological diagnostic into complete and incomplete verbs, §6.3), nominals (体詞), adverbs, adnominals, and seven classes of particles (Chiri 1942: §§21, 65, 85, 92, 117); Murasaki's grammar of the Rayciska dialect operates with essentially the same inventory (Murasaki 1976). This chapter states the criteria that separate the classes and illustrates each with corpus material; the morphology and syntax of each class are treated in the chapters that follow, above all Chapter 7 and Chapter 12.
6.1 Criteria
Word-class membership in Sakhalin Ainu is established morphosyntactically, not notionally. The two tests with the sharpest results are person marking and case marking. A verb is a word that heads a predicate and is indexed for the person of its arguments by the prefixes ku-, e-, eci-, an- and their kin (Chapter 13); a noun is a word that heads a noun phrase, serves as argument of a verb, and combines with case postpositions (Chiri 1942: §65). Person prefixes attach to nouns as well, but there they mark a possessor on the possessed (“belonging”) form in -hV/-VhV (§7.1), not a clause participant. The possessive suffix itself does not separate the two classes: Sakhalin Ainu attaches it to verbs too, as a nominalizing device (Chiri 1942: §77), (Bugaeva 2016: 104–107). What does separate them is distribution: only nouns take case postpositions and head argument phrases, and only verbs take the full argument-indexing paradigm, number marking such as the plural -hci, and the mood and aspect particles of Chiri's first particle class (Chiri 1942: §§41, 117).
| Class | Open? | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| noun | open | heads argument NPs; combines with case postpositions; possessed form in -hV/-VhV with possessor prefixes |
| verb | open | heads predicates; argument person prefixes/suffixes; strict lexical transitivity; verbal number (-hci, stem suppletion) |
| postposition | closed | follows an NP; assigns a case-like relation; uninflected |
| demonstrative/adnominal | closed | precedes the noun; no person or number morphology; cannot be predicate |
| numeral | closed | prenominal like adnominals; nominalized with classifiers (-p/-pe, -n, pis) |
| adverb | closed (plus derivation) | modifies predicates; no inflection; many derived in -no |
| conjunctive particle | closed | clause-final; links the clause to a following clause |
| final/discourse particle | closed | sentence-final or phrase-final; evidential, illocutionary or information-structural meaning |
| interjection | closed | extra-syntactic; utterance-initial or free-standing |
6.2 Nouns
Nouns show no gender, no case inflection, and no obligatory number inflection (Chiri 1942: §§66–68); the plural markers utah ‘people’ and -ahcin are optional and semantically restricted (Chapter 8; (Sakaguchi 2020a), (Sakaguchi 2020b)). The one inflectional opposition every speaker commands is that between the conceptual form and the possessed form, cise ~ cise-he ‘house’ ~ ‘his/her house’, treated in depth in Chapter 7. A noun phrase is head-final: adnominal demonstratives, numerals, possessor nouns and modifying verbs all precede the head. In (1) the demonstrative tan ‘this’ introduces the NP, the head nay ‘river’ serves as possessor of the following possessed noun, and the whole stands as subject of a nominal question predicate.
Within the class, four subclasses need to be distinguished. (i) Common nouns, as in (1). (ii) Locative (relational) nouns such as onnayke ‘inside’, kaske ‘top’, empoke ‘underside’, sanke ‘vicinity’: they follow an NP directly, they alone combine with the simple locative postpositions ta, wa, ene, and when person-marked they take the object prefixes rather than the possessor set Chiri (1942: §79), (Sakaguchi 2024: 20); see §7.5 and Chapter 11. (iii) Formal (bound) nouns such as pe ‘thing’, hi ‘place, time’, ruwe ‘trace’, kusu, which never head a free NP and have lost person marking (Chiri 1942: §80); they supply the language's nominalizers and much of its clause-linking machinery (Chapter 20, Chapter 23). (iv) Personal pronouns, kuani ‘I’, eani ‘you’, anoka ‘we, I’, cioka ‘we’: a small closed set, used only for emphasis or disambiguation, since the person affixes carry the functional load (Chiri 1942: §§81, 90); see Chapter 9. Proper names stand somewhat apart from common nouns in that they form no possessed form (Chiri 1942: §77).
6.3 Verbs
The verb is the morphological centre of the language. Three properties define the class. First, person: a verb is indexed for its subject and object by affixes, third person being zero (Chiri 1942: §§22–23, 37). Second, strict transitivity: every verb stem is lexically specified as intransitive or transitive, and valency is changed only by overt morphology — causative -te/-re, applicative e-/ko-/o-, antipassive i- and the like (Chapter 14). Pairs such as ahun ‘enter’ versus ahunke ‘put in’ or maka ‘open (something)’ versus makke ‘come open’ show the opposition lexically (Chiri 1942: §§28, 35). Third, number: a set of stems distinguishes singular and plural by suppletion or stem alternation (oman ‘go (one)’ ~ paye ‘go (several)’, an ‘exist (one)’ ~ okay ‘exist (several)’), and Sakhalin Ainu adds the plural suffix -hci to verbs of either class (Chiri 1942: §§35, 41); Chapter 8. Verbs have no tense inflection; temporal and aspectual meaning is carried by particles and periphrasis (Chiri 1942: §47) (Chapter 15). In (2) the letter-writer indexes the agent with the indefinite-person prefix an= and pluralizes with =hci.
The second property carries more weight than the bare statement suggests, for Chiri made it the organising axis of his classification. Predicators divide into complete verbs (完用詞), which make a clause without any object — the intransitives, including every property verb of §6.4 — and incomplete verbs (不完用詞), which cannot (Chiri 1942: §§27–28). Membership is read off a single morphological fact, not off translation: the marker Chiri treats as the first person singular — the AN-set, glossed INDEF in this grammar (Chapter 13) — is suffixed to a complete verb but prefixed to an incomplete one, ahun-an ‘I went in’ against an-ahunke ‘I put it in’ from the pair above (Chiri 1942: §28). Example (2) shows the prefixal half of the diagnostic on the incomplete e ‘eat’; the suffixal half appears in Chiri's own minimal demonstration, where the antipassive has stripped the object from the incomplete ku ‘drink’:
‘I drank (something).’
Chiri 1942: §33; Sakhalin (dialect not further specified)
The derived stem is objectless, hence complete, and the person marker moves to the suffix slot; underived ku ‘drink (it)’ takes the prefix.
As the example shows, completeness is not frozen in the lexicon: it tracks every change of valency, and the person marking switches sides with it. Operations that add an object — the applicatives e-, ko-, o- and the causatives — turn a complete verb into an incomplete one; operations that fill or suppress the object slot — antipassive i-, reciprocal u-, reflexive yay- and si- — turn an incomplete verb into a complete one (Chiri 1942: §33). Each of these derivations is described in Chapter 14, where the effect of every operation on completeness is noted; the diagnostic itself, with Chiri's homophonous-stem pairs, is taken up again in §12.2.
The copula ne and the existentials an and okay are verbs by every test above, though of minimal valency. The copula even has a place of honour in the dichotomy: Chiri singles it out as the one underived verb whose obligatory second term is a complement rather than an object, so that it inflects with the prefixes of the incomplete class (Chiri 1942: §32). These verbs are described with nominal predication in Chapter 18, and the negative existential isam ‘not exist’ with negation in Chapter 17.
‘As they wept, the wind grew strong and a great rain fell.’
Murasaki 2001: text 8; West Sakhalin, Odasu (Asai Take)
The particle taa, ubiquitous in Asai Take's narration, is glossed EMPH throughout this grammar, following Tangiku (2022). The clause is repeated with intensification in the original; we quote the first occurrence.
Example (4) already shows the central fact of the next section: the property words yuhke ‘be strong’ and poro ‘be big’ are verbs, the first used predicatively, the second prenominally.
6.4 Property concepts are verbs
There is no adjective class. Chiri (1942: §21) assembles the argument for Ainu generally, with Sakhalin material: property words take the same person marking as verbs (ku-poro ‘I am/grow big’, ku-pirika ‘I am well’); they take the same supportive ki ‘do’ (poro ka ki ‘is indeed big’ like oman ka ki ‘does indeed go’); they form imperatives (tunasno pirika! ‘get well quickly!’); and they are aspectually verb-like, poro meaning ‘be big’ or ‘become big’ according to context. The corpus bears this out. Predicative use with a possessed-form subject:
Attributive (prenominal) use, where the property verb precedes its head noun exactly as in (4) above:
The prenominal use is not a special adjectival construction: any verb can stand before a noun under the same conditions, and the modification structure preserves the argument relations of the corresponding clause, as Kirikae shows for Hokkaidō noun phrases (Kirikae 1984: 105–110). Pirika cise ‘good house’ is thus structurally a minimal relative clause, ‘a house that is good’ (Chapter 21). Manner modification is derived: the adverbializer -no turns a property verb into an adverb (Chiri 1942: §64).
‘(She) raised (the child) well.’
Murasaki 2001: text 37; West Sakhalin, Odasu (Asai Take)
6.5 Closed classes
6.5.1 Postpositions and case particles
Grammatical relations of place, goal, source, instrument and company are marked by postpositions, Chiri's fourth particle class, which attach only to nouns (Chiri 1942: §122): ta and ohta ‘at, in’, onne ‘to’, ene ‘towards’, orowa ‘from; and then’, ani ‘with, by means of’, tura ‘together with’, kaari ‘along, through’, poka ‘through, by way of’, pahno ‘as far as’. Common nouns require ohta (historically oro-ta) where locative nouns take bare ta — the main distributional test separating the two noun subclasses (§6.2). The full inventory and its syntax are given in Chapter 11.
6.5.2 Demonstratives and other adnominals
Adnominals (Chiri's 連体詞) modify a noun and do nothing else: they head no phrase, take no person marking, and never serve as predicates (Chiri 1942: §92). The Sakhalin demonstrative set is proximal tan ‘this’, distal tara ‘that yonder’ (also tara-an), against Hokkaidō toan; Chiri cites tara seta ‘that dog’ from Piłsudski (Chiri 1942: §97). In the corpus of Asai Take 浅井タケ the anaphoric neya ‘that aforementioned’ picks up an established referent, the pronominal tah ‘this one’ refers to things, and taa serves chiefly as a discourse particle of staging (glossed EMPH). Demonstratives and numerals may stack, in that order, but two demonstratives may not (Chiri 1942: §94). sine ‘one’ doubles as an indefinite article-like marker, ‘a certain’ (Chiri 1942: §115), as in (10) below. See further Chapter 9.
6.5.3 Numerals
Numerals pattern with adnominals: sine ‘one’, tu ‘two’ (tuh), re ‘three’ (reh) and so on stand before a counted noun and cannot stand alone; to count in isolation they must be nominalized by a classifier, -p/-pe for things, -n for people, pis for ‘pieces’ (Chiri 1942: §113). The system is vigesimal (hoh ‘twenty’, (Chiri 1942: §108)), and Sakhalin speakers also used a decimal series borrowed through the Amur (“Santan”) trade, sine kunkutu ‘ten’, sine tanku ‘hundred’ Chiri (1942: §112), (Murasaki 2009), (Sakaguchi 2022). Chapter 10 gives the full system.
‘When the two wooden balls came out, the woman wrapped them in a fine robe and put them under her pillow.’
Murasaki 2001: text 52; West Sakhalin, Odasu (Asai Take)
muhru empoke ene ‘to under the pillow’: locative noun empoke with the allative ene (§6.2, §7.5).
6.5.4 Adverbs
Adverbs modify a predicate or a whole clause and are themselves uninflected: they take no person, number, mood or case morphology, which is what separates them from verbs and nouns, and they precede the element they modify rather than following it, which separates them from the particles. Chiri sets the adverb (副詞) up as a class of its own, distinct from both the nominals and the adnominals, and notes that the Sakhalin adverb lexicon diverges considerably from Hokkaidō (Chiri 1942: §§64, 88). The class has three morphological sources. (i) A small closed set of underived adverbs, mostly temporal, aspectual and degree words: tani ‘now’, suy ‘again’, naa ‘still, more’, ramma ‘always’, reekoh ‘very’, ponno ‘a little’. (ii) A large open set of manner adverbs derived from property verbs by the adverbializer -no (§6.4): pirika-no ‘well’ from pirika ‘be good’, monas-no ‘quickly, at once’ from monas ‘be quick’ (Chiri 1942: §64). Because any property verb can feed it, this is where the productivity of the class lies; the underived core stays small. (iii) Reduplicated and expressive adverbs, in which a base is doubled for intensity or distributed reading — ponno ponno ‘just a little, bit by bit’ (example 2 above, and the ‘skip a little’ of Asai Take's ponno ponno…cooko) — continuous with the lexical reduplication described in Chapter 5 (Morphophonology).
By meaning the inventory falls into a handful of classes. Temporal adverbs locate the event in time: tani ‘now’, ubiquitous in the Asai corpus as a narrative ‘now, at this point’, tanto ‘today’, nuuman ‘yesterday’, simma ‘tomorrow’ (simma e=oman ‘go tomorrow’, Asai Take). Since the verb has no tense (§15.1), these words carry much of the temporal location that inflection does elsewhere. Aspectual and frequency adverbs quantify over occurrences: suy ‘again’, the commonest of all, which restarts an episode in narrative; naa ‘still, yet’, which in Sentoku Tarōji's letters marks a state as continuing (naa…e=an ‘you are still there’); and ramma ‘always, as ever’, likewise from the Sentoku letters (ramma ka pirika ‘are well as ever’). The completive notion ‘finish doing’ is carried not by an adverb but by the verb hemaka ‘finish’ (Chapter 15), the iterative-habitual by the conjunctive koh (Chapter 15). Degree adverbs scale the predicate: intensifying reekoh ‘very’, which the Karafuto wordlists label explicitly as an adverb ‘very, exceedingly’; diminishing ponno ‘a little’; and the quantifier-like okore ‘all’ (okore oyra ‘forget all’), the Sakhalin counterpart of Hokkaidō opitta, whose own reflex opista the corpus uses only in the Sentoku letters. Manner adverbs are chiefly the -no class, joined by the demonstrative-based nah ‘thus, so’ ‘in that way’ (nah kii ‘do so’) and ene ‘like this’. The deictic and directional adverbs — teeta ‘here’, ene and their kin — pattern with the demonstrative system and are treated under it (Chapter 9).
‘Again she went up into the hills to gather firewood, it is said.’
Murasaki 2001: text 12; West Sakhalin, Odasu (Asai Take)
suy ‘again’ stands clause-initially, scoping over the whole event; the purpose phrase niina kusu precedes the matrix verb makan.
Syntactically, adverbs are not arguments and take no postposition; they attach to the predicate rather than to a noun. The default position is immediately before the constituent modified — degree adverbs hug the property verb, as reekoh pirika in the second example, and manner -no adverbs sit just before their verb, as pirika-no reske ‘raised (the child) well’ in (7) — while temporal and aspectual adverbs with clausal scope favour clause-initial position, as suy and tani repeatedly do in narrative. Two neighbouring devices are not part of this class. Negative polarity is not adverbial: it is built on the ham-family negators (hannehka, hanki, the proclitic ham=) and the negative existential isam, all treated in Chapter 17. And the scalar-additive ka, kayki and the restrictive pateh ‘only’ are clitic focus particles, placed after their host rather than before it (§24.2). The interaction of adverb placement with the basic verb-final order of the clause is taken up in Chapter 19 (The simple clause and word order).
6.5.5 Conjunctive particles
Clause linkage is managed by clause-final conjunctive particles, Chiri's third particle class (Chiri 1942: §120): sequential teh ‘and’ (the Sakhalin counterpart of Hokkaidō wa, (Chiri 1942: §121)) and wa, both glossed ‘and’ in this grammar; ike ‘and, and then’; causal kusu ‘because’ and renkayne ‘because of’; concessive yahka and yahkayki ‘although’; conditional anah ‘if’, ciki ‘if’, cikin ‘if’; habitual-correlative koh ‘whenever’. kusu also marks purpose, and with a following existential builds an incipient progressive (kayo kusu an ‘is calling’, Chapter 15). The division of labour among these linkers is the subject of Chapter 23. Example (14) shows anah with the first person plural exclusive set; (15) shows yahkayki and teh.
‘Well then, if we do it too, we will eat.’
Murasaki 2001: text 41; West Sakhalin, Odasu (Asai Take)
The exclusive plural forms here refer to the speaker alone, a use of the plural regular in quoted speech in the Asai corpus (Sakaguchi 2024: 18).
6.5.6 Sentence-final and discourse particles
The right edge of the Sakhalin sentence carries a rich set of particles. The reportative manu closes nearly every narrative sentence of the Asai corpus and marks the content as transmitted knowledge; it belongs to the evidential system described in Chapter 16 ((Dal Corso 2018); (Chiri 1942: §117) classes it among the mood particles). The quotative nah closes direct speech before a verb of saying or thinking (Chapter 22). The additive-scalar ka ‘even, too’ follows nouns and converbal clauses; the topic particles anak and anakne, prominent in Hokkaidō, are largely supplanted in the corpus by the construction with neampe (Chapter 24). Emotive and interactional particles include interrogative hee, softening waa (example 10 of Chapter 7), and na of assertion; Chiri's minimal pair is seta he? ‘a dog?’ against seta un! ‘a dog!’ (Chiri 1942: §128).
6.5.7 Interjections
Interjections stand outside clause syntax: attention-calling iineahsuy ‘say, hey’, which opens requests and questions throughout the Asai corpus (so in example 10 of Chapter 7); keh ‘well then’ in (14) above; assenting ee ‘yes’. They take no morphology and combine with no particle, which is what distinguishes them from adverbs.